<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cincinnati Riverfront Homes &#8211; River House Landing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amybsells.com/buying/cincinnati-riverfront-homes-river-house-landing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amybsells.com/buying/cincinnati-riverfront-homes-river-house-landing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin LeMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.amybsells.com/buying/cincinnati-riverfront-homes-river-house-landing/comment-page-1#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin LeMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amybsells.com/blog/2007/12/18/cincinnati-riverfront-homes-river-house-landing/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I apologize if this posted twice.

I take issue with your assertion that somehow Kentucky once again &quot;won the battle for riverfront housing&quot;.  How so?

First of all, it was developable land on long-neglected riverfront in Kentucky and wasn&#039;t a project where the developers had to make a choice what side of the river to choose...

...because the Cincinnati skyline is best visible from Kentucky, for obvious reasons, and...

...this project has been under construction for several months.

I love Kentucky, but I always have to challenge statements like this because there&#039;s this line of thinking that somehow Kentucky is somehow on fire, when in fact it is really just finally catching up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize if this posted twice.</p>
<p>I take issue with your assertion that somehow Kentucky once again &#8220;won the battle for riverfront housing&#8221;.  How so?</p>
<p>First of all, it was developable land on long-neglected riverfront in Kentucky and wasn&#8217;t a project where the developers had to make a choice what side of the river to choose&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;because the Cincinnati skyline is best visible from Kentucky, for obvious reasons, and&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;this project has been under construction for several months.</p>
<p>I love Kentucky, but I always have to challenge statements like this because there&#8217;s this line of thinking that somehow Kentucky is somehow on fire, when in fact it is really just finally catching up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
